Význam „clinical guidelines” pro určení náležité odborné úrovně poskytování zdravotních služeb. Relevance of clinical guidelines for determining required standard of care in medical negligence disputes
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstrakt: Cílem tohoto příspěvku je objasnění významu clinical guidelines v oblasti právní odpovědnosti pro určení náležité odborné úrovně poskytování zdravotních služeb. Úvodem příspěvku je pojednáno o významných subjektech, jež clinical guidelines vydávají, stejně tak jako o jejich druzích, a to nejen v České republice, ale i v Německu a Velké Británii. Následuje pasáž osvětlující úskalí určování náležité odborné úrovně poskytování zdravotních služeb podle clinical guidelines. Závěrem je naopak pojednáno o jejich přínosech.
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to explain the relevance of clinical guidelines in the law of medical malpractice in relation to the determination of the required standard of care. At the beginning of the paper the persons that publish such guidelines in the Czech Republic, Germany and Great Britain are discussed as well as the types of the clinical guidelines. Then, the difficulties that are associated with using clinical guidelines for determination of the required standard of care follow. In the end of the paper the benefits of the guidelines in the medical malpractice are mentioned.
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
d) By submitting the manuscript the author acknowledges that after the publication in JMBL her/his work will be made available online to the Internet users and also kept by the Library of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. Author's rights to further use the work remain unabridged.
References
AHRENS, Hans Jürgen (eds). Medizin und Haftung, Festschrift für Erwin Deutsch zum 80. Geburtstag. Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer, 2009. ISBN 978-3-642-00612-8.
BOBINSKI, Mary Anne – HALL, Mark A. – ORENTLICHER, David. Medical liability and treatment relationships. 2nd edition. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2008. ISBN 978-073-557-105-1.
BYRNE, Gerald. Clinical Practice Guidelines: New Remedies and Old. Quarterly Review of Tort Law. 2010/2011, Vol. 4, No. 2, s. 1–11.
DEUTSCH, Erwin – SPICKHOFF Andreas. Medizinrecht Arztrecht, Arzneimittelrecht, Medizinprodukterecht und Transfusionsrecht. 7. Auflage. Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer, 2014. ISBN 978-36-423-8149-2.
DOLEŽAL, Tomáš. Vztah lékaře a pacienta z pohledu soukromého práva. Praha: Leges, 2012. ISBN 978-80-87576-24-3.
FIELD, Marilyn J. – LOHR, Kathleen N. (eds). Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1992. ISBN 0309045894.
GERMAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL SOCIETIES (AWMF), Standing Guidelines Commission. AWMF Guidance Manual and Rules for Guideline Development. 1st edition. 2012. Dostupné z: <http://www.awmf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Leitlinien/AWMF-Regelwerk/AWMF-Guidance_2013.pdf>.
HAVIGHURST, Clark C. Practice Guidelines as Legal Standards Governing Physician Liability. Law and Contemporary Problems. 1991, Vol. 54, No. 2, s. 87–118.
LAING, Judith – McHALE, Jean (eds). Principles of medical law. 3rd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-01-9954-440-0.
MUTSCHLER, Wolf-Eberhard (ed.). Praxis der Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. 3., vollst. überarb. Auflage. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2014. ISBN 978-31-3159-763-2.
PALANDT, Otto. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. 69. neubearbeitete Auflage. München: C. H. Beck, 2010. ISBN 978-340-6594-885.
SAMANTA, Ash – MELLO, Michelle M. – FOSTER, Charles – TINGLE, John. The Role of Clinical guidelines in Medical Negligence Litigation: A Shift from the Bolam Standard? Medical Law Review. 2006, Vol. 14, No. 3, s. 321–366.
SAMANTA, Ash – SAMANTA, Jo. Medical law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. ISBN 978-02-3023-532-8.
VELTEN, Wolfram. Der medizinische Standard im Arzthaftungsprozeß: ein Beitrag zu Umfang und Grenzen der Darlegungslast von Arzthaftungsklägern bezüglich der Standards medizinischer Heilbehandlung. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001. ISBN 3-7890-7099-8.